Unbelievably, Morgan Freeman is 75 today! He is most famously known for his smooth, melifluous tones, making him easily the greatest narrator available for any story like to tug the occasional heartstring and culminate in an uplifting scene, but his lovable, greatest-grandfather-yoou-never-had persona has been perfectly suited to many other roles too. Let's have a look at the ones that fitted most perfectly.
Showing posts with label Morgan Freeman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morgan Freeman. Show all posts
Friday, 1 June 2012
Monday, 28 May 2012
Unlisted: Invictus

Mandela's plan, it seems, is for the Springboks - a team so despised by the black population that they instinctively root for whoever is playing against them, and who hadn't been doing terribly well before Mandela got involved - to win the Rugby World Cup in less than a year's time, though experts believe they'll get no further than the quarter finals at best. The Springboks, with only one black player and a uniform of apartheid's green and gold, find themselves in a position where their president wants them to be cheered on by the entire mixed nation, so embark on a PR campaign involving playing and teaching rugby to the poor black kids from the slums of the country. Going in, I thought his plan would have been to create a team comprised of 50% blacks and whites, thereby creating animosity as to whether the players were recruited for their skill or the colour of their skin, but in effect his plan was... nothing. Other than some inspirational speeches, standard marketing techniques, a slightly more intense training regime and an admirable cause, the aim seems to be just to will the team to win. Much like Million Dollar Baby, I could have done with some more time spent on the reasons behind the success, not simply showing it.
Saturday, 26 May 2012
Million Dollar Baby

If there's two criticisms that can be lauded onto Eastwood, it's that he doesn't direct happy stories or portray more than one character. He's not renowned for making lighter films with happy endings or playing people who aren't grumpy, stoic curmudgeons with their trousers too high, and his streak continues here. I know he's made a few lighter films (Paint Your Wagon, Every Which Way But Loose) but I haven't seen them, and I'm guessing he plays the grumpy, stoic, possibly singing straightman to a comically messy primate who never stops annoying him. Again, please let me know if I'm wrong and recommend any films where he flashes a smile, once.
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Unforgiven

Unforgiven sees Eastwood as William Munny, a former hardened killer reformed by the love of a good women and the birth of his two children. With his wife dead and their herd of pigs stricken with fever, Munny accepts the offer from young upstart The Schofield Kid (Jaimz Woolvett) to kill two ruffians who cut up a whore after she laughed at one of them having a small penis. They team up with Munny's former partner Ned Logan (Morgan Freeman) and head out to the town of Big Whiskey, lorded over by Gene Hackman's occasionally violent 'Little' Bill Daggett, where other hired killers, including Richard Harris' English Bob, are also heading to claim the bounty.
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Seven

After a disturbingly evocative opening credits sequence enriched with depth and meaning on repeated viewings, we meet Morgan Freeman's detective Somerset, picking up his last case, a sickeningly masterful serial killer with a penchant for the seven deadly sins, the same day as Brad Pitt's Detective Mills arrives to replace him. That's as much setup as there is, as we follow the mismatched detectives from crime scene to crime scene, via their headquarters and areas of research, with Somerset whiling a night away poring over books in the library, whilst Mills take a brief glance at the Cliff notes.
Saturday, 21 April 2012
The Dark Knight

Not that
this is a perfect film. There are flaws, including the Joker’s plan being at
times a tad too pre-emptive, some ominous camera angles and music cues hinting unsubtly
a character’s true motives earlier than should have been done, and the bit with
the cellphones, which is a bit silly, but is that really enough to warrant a
1-star rating? The fact that these reviewers (I won’t give them the satisfaction
of names or links, only seek them out to feel the rage bubble inside you) fail
to note even one positive point in a movie overflowing with brilliance negates
any opinion they deem worthy of sharing. I personally find it impossible to
find nothing good in a movie – The Adventures
of Pluto Nash is an abomination unto film, yet Randy Quaid is a delight as
Nash’s robotic assistant; Big Trouble in Little China is easily one of the worst films I’ve reviewed from the list
so far, but it has imaginative (if insane) monsters and mythology, some
dialogue that surpasses cheesy to being inspired, and features Kim Cattrall
back when she was attractive. Therefore, with such damning reviews as these ‘people’
have offered, they are in fact unwittingly proving how good a film it is.
Leaping
from the tantalising springboard ending of BatmanBegins – Gary Oldman’s Jim Gordon showing Batman a playing card left as the
mark of a new criminal, calling himself The Joker, we dive headlong into a
wonderfully executed bank heist, as six masked goons effortlessly separate mob
money from the vaults it was stored in. Director Chris Nolan has made no secret
that Heat, Michael Mann’s superb
DeNiro/Pacino cat and mouse crime epic, was a huge influence on the Dark Knight, and it shows, from a
William Fichtner cameo to a central meeting of the hero and villain, even mentioning
a cup of coffee.

Unusually
for Nolan, the film is actually quite funny. It’s not exactly laugh-a-minute
(there’s certainly less than 152 jokes here), the script is still a lot more humorous
than you might remember. There’s also absolutely no filler, with every strand
being integral to the plot; a true achievement when you consider just how
engaging the story is, even when new elements are being added right up until
the last few scenes.
As always
with Nolan’s films, there’s a couple of cinematography moments that I’d have
tried differently (see Inception),
most notably the scene where the Joker leaves a hospital, which could have
looked truly tremendous had it been one unbroken shot, without needlessly
cutting away to some pedestrians nearby, but this is a small matter that is
more of a personal niggle than a criticism.
Anyway,
for those wondering if they should watch the film again before the upcoming
trilogy closer The Dark Knight Rises
this summer, the answer is a resounding yes. Even if you don’t intend to see
part 3 (I assume you’re planning on gouging out your own eyeballs, just in case
it isn’t any good, there’s no other reason not to see it) you should watch The Dark Knight again, just because it’s
probably the best film to have been released in the last 5 years, if not more.
Choose
film 9/10
Wednesday, 27 July 2011
Batman Begins
As the title suggests, this predominantly covers Batman’s origin story, from the death of his parents after he becomes scared at the theatre, through his training by Liam Neeson’s Ducard, his development of a crime-fighting persona and his confrontation with his former mentor in a city ridden with toxin-crazed criminals and madmen. This is arguably the most realistic, or at least vaguely plausible comic book movie ever made, with the only real superpowers on display being a gas that makes people insane and a ridiculously vast fortune to funs Bruce Wayne’s double lifestyle. Granted, the secret passage in Wayne Manor is operated by hitting a coded sequence of piano keys, but this can be forgiven, and is at least a variation from the classic sliding of a secret book on a shelf.
The film has become criminally underrated since the release of the cinematic behemoth that was the Dark Knight, but Begins gives more room for Christian Bale’s Batman to breathe, as opposed to battling for screen time with the Joker and Two-Face. Not that Begins is light on villains, as alongside the aforementioned Ducard there is Tom Wilkinson’s mob boss Carmine Falcony and Cillian Murphy’s malicious Scarecrow, whose mask is genuinely unsettling. Padding out the good guys are Morgan Freeman’s tech-wiz Lucius Fox, Gary Oldman’s police commissioner Gordon and, of course, Michael Caine’s introduction to a new generation of fans as Wayne’s butler Alfred.
Certainly at times it is easy to lose track of who’s hitting whom in the fistfights, director Chris Nolan’s Batarang approach to plotting seems to suit the film better than it does the audience and somebody really needs to tell Katie Holmes to just stop being in films, but this is still one of the better superhero films in an ever increasingly crowded genre. You should await the forthcoming Dark Knight Rises with a barely concealed level of glee.
Choose film 8/10
Labels:
08/10,
5-Star 500,
Batman,
Batman Begins,
Choose Film,
Christian Bale,
Christopher Nolan,
Cillian Murphy,
Empire Top 500,
Gary Oldman,
Katie Holmes,
Liam Neeson,
Michael Caine,
Morgan Freeman,
TF 100,
The List
Friday, 22 April 2011
The Shawshank Redemption

Choose film 9/10
Wednesday, 10 November 2010
R.E.D.
Do you want to see Morgan Freeman beat up Richard Dreyfuss? John Malkovich take out a rocket with a single bullet? Helen Mirren threaten to bury someone in the woods before unleashing Hell with a sniper rifle? Of course you do, so you should go and see RED. This movie is all about playing against type, with almost all of the principle cast not being well known for action roles. Bruce Willis, obviously, is the most well known for out-and-out balls to the wall action, and Karl Urban, perfecting his unemoting suit with balls ready for his next role as Judge Dredd, has done his fair share, but personally I’ve never seen Brian Cox unload an uzi on someone.
It’s refreshing too to see Hollywood actors playing their age, knowingly accepting put downs (“I wanted you to have hair”), and for the love interest to be a real, flawed person, albeit ten years younger than Willis, stuck in a dead end job, single with no prospects, plausibly forging a telephone relationship with someone she hasn’t met. It would have been easy to cast a younger, thinner, blonder identikit actress like Katherine Heigl or Rachel McAdams, but instead to use Mary Louise-Parker, more known for her TV work in Weeds and the West Wing, crows’ feet as defined as her comic timing and ability to hold her own with her more, ahem, experienced co-stars, is a welcome touch.
Thanks the heavens for the casting of Ernest Borgnine, deserving of my in-the-air fist-pump every time he came on the screen. The guy’s a legend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)