
Not that
this is a perfect film. There are flaws, including the Joker’s plan being at
times a tad too pre-emptive, some ominous camera angles and music cues hinting unsubtly
a character’s true motives earlier than should have been done, and the bit with
the cellphones, which is a bit silly, but is that really enough to warrant a
1-star rating? The fact that these reviewers (I won’t give them the satisfaction
of names or links, only seek them out to feel the rage bubble inside you) fail
to note even one positive point in a movie overflowing with brilliance negates
any opinion they deem worthy of sharing. I personally find it impossible to
find nothing good in a movie – The Adventures
of Pluto Nash is an abomination unto film, yet Randy Quaid is a delight as
Nash’s robotic assistant; Big Trouble in Little China is easily one of the worst films I’ve reviewed from the list
so far, but it has imaginative (if insane) monsters and mythology, some
dialogue that surpasses cheesy to being inspired, and features Kim Cattrall
back when she was attractive. Therefore, with such damning reviews as these ‘people’
have offered, they are in fact unwittingly proving how good a film it is.
Leaping
from the tantalising springboard ending of BatmanBegins – Gary Oldman’s Jim Gordon showing Batman a playing card left as the
mark of a new criminal, calling himself The Joker, we dive headlong into a
wonderfully executed bank heist, as six masked goons effortlessly separate mob
money from the vaults it was stored in. Director Chris Nolan has made no secret
that Heat, Michael Mann’s superb
DeNiro/Pacino cat and mouse crime epic, was a huge influence on the Dark Knight, and it shows, from a
William Fichtner cameo to a central meeting of the hero and villain, even mentioning
a cup of coffee.

Unusually
for Nolan, the film is actually quite funny. It’s not exactly laugh-a-minute
(there’s certainly less than 152 jokes here), the script is still a lot more humorous
than you might remember. There’s also absolutely no filler, with every strand
being integral to the plot; a true achievement when you consider just how
engaging the story is, even when new elements are being added right up until
the last few scenes.
As always
with Nolan’s films, there’s a couple of cinematography moments that I’d have
tried differently (see Inception),
most notably the scene where the Joker leaves a hospital, which could have
looked truly tremendous had it been one unbroken shot, without needlessly
cutting away to some pedestrians nearby, but this is a small matter that is
more of a personal niggle than a criticism.
Anyway,
for those wondering if they should watch the film again before the upcoming
trilogy closer The Dark Knight Rises
this summer, the answer is a resounding yes. Even if you don’t intend to see
part 3 (I assume you’re planning on gouging out your own eyeballs, just in case
it isn’t any good, there’s no other reason not to see it) you should watch The Dark Knight again, just because it’s
probably the best film to have been released in the last 5 years, if not more.
Choose
film 9/10