data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4a0b/a4a0bedf509791ca4bc04297e7ee4e611704a545" alt=""
In
2089 a group of scientists, led by Shaw and Holloway (Noomi Rapace and Logan
Marshall-Green) discover ancient cave paintings on the Isle of Skye depicting
giant humanoids reaching up to 6 orbs in the sky. The drawing matches others
found all over the world, and point towards a distant planet that may hold some
key to the origins of mankind. Four years later, the scientists arrive at the
planet LV223 as part of a 17-man crew aboard the Peter Weyland-funded ship
Prometheus. Once there, the crew find traces of alien life, but are the answers
they receive the ones they were hoping for?
Ridley
Scott made Alien, arguably the greatest sci-fi film ever
made and his greatest movie to date, 33 years ago. In the meantime he's made
some iconic films (Blade Runner, Gladiator), some great films (Thelma & Louise, Black Hawk Down)
and some good, but not groundbreaking works (American Gangster, Matchstick
Men), but he's never lived up to his early masterpiece. His last great film
was Black Hawk Down in 2001, and since then his works haven't really set
the world alight, so no-one can blame him for wanting to relive past glories.
Dipping back into the Alien well can only be a good thing, surely, and
it seems this is one of the most anticipated films of the year, with prequel
hype not seen since The Phantom Menace.
Fortunately
this isn't George Lucas, and this isn't Star Wars. Whilst no Alien,
or even Aliens, Prometheus doesn't disappoint - much. There's
only one area that I can really criticise it for, so I'm going to get that out
of the way before I laud it's praises. The script is terrible. Not necessarily
the dialogue, although that isn't great, but the whole story is so full of
gaping plot holes that it's incredibly distracting. I'm trying to keep this
review spoiler free, so all the plot holes I came up with are going to be
written into a second post uploaded after this one, so after you watch the film
you can see what I mean, and if you really enjoyed the film then don't read it,
as it'll spoil it a bit more. If, like me, you left the cinema having enjoyed
it but feeling not quite complete, then go ahead and read to feel
enlightened.
The script, written by Lost co-creator Damon
Lindelof and newcomer Jon Spaihts (he wrote the screenplay for the Emile Hirsch
train wreck The Darkest Hour) is the only weak link of the film, and
it's pretty fragile. Whether it's poorly developed caricatures where leading
characters should be, foggy motives or an unclear plot, there's rarely a point
at which the story keeps it together. Bizarrely, there's both too much and too
little exposition, as some aspects go unexplained whilst others are clearly
signposted for future developments. Everything mentioned in the first 45
minutes will be used later on, without fail. A few more weeks spent on the
story could have made this a solid 9/10 movie, up there with the other classics
from the franchise, but unfortunately it wasn't meant to be. It seems Scott was
in too much of a hurry to make a successful, good film that he didn't wait
around for a good story, just taking what was around.
OK,
negativity out of the way, let's hand out some compliments. The film is
breathtakingly beautiful. Opening with stunning Icelandic scenery, it's
difficult not to get lost in the waterfalls and mountains. The visual effects
are incredible too. We're introduced to a race known as the Engineers that are
so utterly believable you forget they aren't real. The sets are phenomenal, as
is the attention to detail in the costumes and character designs, and there's
enough references to the rest of the franchise to keep fanboys happy, including
some set-ups that could eventually lead into Alien, 37 years later
within the film's timeline. Rapace's heroine Shaw is the obvious parallel with
Sigourney Weaver's Ripley. Both are strong, eventually independent women who
spend an inordinate amount of time in their underwear, though Shaw is given so
much characterisation comparatively to the rest of the crew that it's clear she
is the main character from the start, whereas with Alien the screentime
and details were kept roughly equal. That's another area where the film doesn't
play to it's strengths. It was smartly marketed as not being part of the Alien
franchise, more a part of the same universe but telling it's own story, but
there are so many parallels that this doesn't hold up. Whether it's shots
mimicking the discovery of the egg chamber, characters wielding a flamethrower
or an impossible basketball shot straight out of Alien Resurrection,
they can't quite seem to detach themselves from the story.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3fe7/d3fe7cdb3eae402dc6bc3f6485e6939341c6ce22" alt=""
The
initial story set-up is promising. The crew of the ship here are mostly unlike
any seen in this franchise before. Where Alien featured a blue-collar
working crew who didn't ask for what happened to them, Aliens saw a
bunch of gung-ho marines charging into the fray and Alien³ was set
amongst a religious prison cult (I can't remember what happened in Alien
Resurrection), here we have scientists and researchers going on a venture
of discovery to further mankind. Where Alien (I can't stop making the
comparison, sorry) had several key scenes, this one only has a couple. One is
truly difficult to watch, with Rapace's Shaw going through an ordeal almost as
bad as she endured in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.
As I
said, the film is absolutely spot-on in almost every way apart from the story,
which unfortunately plays a pretty big role. There's enough here to make it
worth a watch though, and fans of the other films won't be disappointed.
Choose
film 7/10
So jealous!
ReplyDeleteCouldn't believe I got to go! Watching any other film just isn'y going to be the same again though. Paid for it the next day, had an 8-hour meeting at work after 4 hours sleep and a 3-hour journey back from London. Worth it.
Delete